Tag Archives: ARI VINEBERG

THE ROD

The man largely responsible for my introduction to the world of fly-fishing was none other than Paul Bean, an Atlantic salmon fly tier of great renown and whose exquisite patterns, veritable works of a lost piscatorial art, grace the walls of such dignitaries and sportsmen as Prince Philip, Robert Redford, and ex-president George Bush. 

These are not your normal, everyday, store bought flies.

What makes both Paul and his flies unique and sought after, is that they are painstaking artistic recreations of old British Atlantic Salmon patterns from centuries ago, and that he is probably one of the few human beings alive that possesses this self-taught knowledge, based on years of archival research.  The flies are fully functional, of course, and you can fish with them, but most of them cost a small fortune and lie protected behind glass in ornate frames on a wall,  perhaps accompagnied with one of his wife Maureen`s beautiful watercolors of a Matapedia fishing scene.  The tying of these patterns is an all-consuming task, a labor of love that can sometimes take hundred of hours before Paul is satisfied with the end result. Needless to say, he only cranks out a few of these every year and these are quickly scooped up by collectors across the globe.

I was doubly fortunate through geography that Paul lived near us in the bucolic Eastern Townships in southern Quebec and that he had also been a good friend of my father since the post-war days, when they had some business together. It was Paul who made my first fly rod, a fast action eight weight hexagonal split bamboo, a dark burnished magohany that was gloriously varnished, with a half wells cork grip and a cherry wood reel seat with garnished german silver fittings.  It was his first attempt at making a bamboo rod and it was presented to me by my father as a gift to me for my thirteenth birthday, probably in the hope that I would stay out of trouble and learn something about the life lessons of nature in the process. These were the best times of my life and with that rod were laid out my first flies on the waters closest to my home.

With the rod came a few courses of instruction and Paul proved to be a patient teacher despite the inadequacies of his new pupil. The gospel according to Paul, at least in regards to basic casting mechanics, involved locking the elbow to the side of the body and moving the rod from a ten to one position on a imaginary clock, counting down the cast - one, two, three, one. It was the classic metronome method, old school, austere, and Presbyterian  in its approach; yet, in retrospect, it was a lesson in basic fundamentals  that worked well enough and was not to rigid as to preclude incorporating one’s own personal physical style to the formula. 

There were three types of casts we practiced - single and double hauls, as well as the roll cast, useful in tight quarters where a backcast is out of the question or when fishing a short or sinking line. Distance was less important than accuracy and stealth. Twenty-feet was all you needed was a mainstay of Paul’s casting catechism.  A drag free drift when fishing dry flies was paramount to success and the drift on a shorter cast line was much easier to mend and control than a long one.  Cast three or four times over the the same water and shuffle two steps downstream without kicking up too much of the riverbed! Repeat the process. It was all pretty traditional stuff.

 But when it came to fishing his approach was anything but conventional, at least in those days when nobody admitted to fishing for anything other than trout or salmon with a fly - such an endeavor would be heresy to the purists at a time when the sport was still highly elitist and limited in its scope of vision as to the possibilities of fishing with flies. Paul, on the other hand, a forward thinker, was an advocate of fishing for other species as well, such as bass, pike, and musky on the fly. He ultimately believed that all fish could be caught on a fly and backed it up by doing it, from flyfishing for Shad on the St-John’s to catching giant largemouth bass on Memphremagog.

Interspersed with the casting lessons, were discourses on fish conservation, habitat, old fishing trips, stories of great fish and salmon camps, life lessons of the Great Depression and War, anectotes about his great friend and legendary salmon guide Richard Adams, reel maker Stan Bogden, and almost anything else regarding the fishing life and the human condition. Paul could talk about anything. On these hot summer afternoons, as he told me all these things, mostly in dribs and drabs, imperfect thoughts that wafted uncertainly skyward like the flight of ephemera, time seemed to stand still and we were the at the epicenter of the Universe. He was a great mentor and shared his knowledge of the sport with selflessness, honesty, and passion, as it should.

One afternoon, as we were practicing on the lawn behind the library of the Bishop’s University in Lennoxville, Paul recounted something to me that was beyond my comprehension at the time and that I had always remembered, and had somewhat nagged at me ever since. It seemed that there was a period in his life where he had given up fishing for a few years, following some difficult yet unspoken tragedy in his life where either some great personal or financial loss had been incurred, or he had suffered some other existential crisis leading to a period of depression. He never told me straight up what it was and had muttered something about not being able to hook or land a fish, losing his patience and passion, no longer enjoying it and eventually walking away from the sport for a few years before finally getting back on the water. Up until that that time in his life, he had only fished for salmon and trout, but when he started fishing again he began experimenting with other species that were to be found in waters closer to home.

It was my uncle Mort that got him tying bass flies and then eventually, after much cajoling about the poor quality of Paul’s bass flies - which nevertheless got hammered on a daily basis - he succeeded in getting him to join him for some smallmouth bass fishing on Lake Massawippi.  Paul loved it. A solid friendship developed between them, at one point they even bought a property with a large lake and stocked it with bass and trout and fished almost every night after work. As best remembered, while most of my family thought that Mort was lazy and shiftless and would never amount to anything , the truth of the matter is that were it not for him, Paul may never have begun tying his amazing flies.

And as he shared his thoughts about the times and events and ups and downs of his life with me,  the small bits and pieces of the jugsaw puzzle that is everyman’s existence began to take shape, amidst poorly cast lines that landed in spaghetti loops at my feet on hot and lazy summer afternoons where time stood still during our long walks along the river. Along the way he would identify insects using their latin names, but my thoughts kept returning to that period in his life when he no longer fished. It was something that my soft adolescent brain could not understand - why would anyone stop fishing if they didn’t have to or were required not to do so by law. There are so many reasons why people fish - the real question is why more or all people do not!

That summer seemed to last a lifetime and after that I saw Paul less frequently as I went away to school for a few years, although we had fished together twice since and had dinner and a few beers out on the porch of his house one summer evening in North Hatley after I had returned from my studies at McGill. Again, for a few years we lost touch and when I last heard, much to my sorrow, he had passed away after a lengthy illness.

It was a few years back, after a period of personal upheaval, trials, and loss, and where a sudden responsibility had fallen upon me, I experienced one of those weird seasons where nothing seemed to feel natural, my patience was lacking, and where a large proportion of the fish hooked were lost through either error or bad luck. My timing was off and couldn’t manage a decent cast, had no confidence in the flies tied at the end of my tippet, had a hard time spotting feeding fish and never managed to hook or fight them properly, or so it seemed.

Something essential was missing and I had great difficulties coming to grips with the situation. After a season of that nonsense, my patience at it’s limit, fishing trips became less frequent, and then one day just stopped altogether for about a year or so. After a twenty-five year quest for the Holy Grail of fishing, that wonderful bamboo rod was placed in it cylindrical aluminum tube and stored in a basement closet.

It was during this time that was slowly realized that which Paul had been unable to express to a child who was certainly too young to understand at the time; and that how most of a man’s life, like a fish in a stream, was such as slippery thing to come to grips with and give meaning to, even though it all boiled down to a few simple basics, like locking your elbow to the side and counting down the cast. One-Two-Three-One. Then shuffling forward a few feet without mucking things up too much. Repeat.

Last April, the old rod that Paul built for me was found in a closet and with it, on the rivers closest to my home, fishing became fun once again. ARI VINEBERG

Post from: Bounty Fishing Blog

LOST FISH

IMAGINE IF YOU WILL how intolerably boring the enterprise of sportfishing would be if we were always assured of success in landing each and every fish hooked. It would certainly, in the long run, truly be unbearable and in fact, by theoretical definition, the endeavor could no longer be called a “sport” as the element of chance, an inherent criteria for any game, will have been removed.

While it is a generally accepted axiom in fishing that luck decreases as a factor determining success or failure as the skill level of the angler increases,  in this brave new world of fisherman egalitarianism advanced skills become unneccesary and luck, either good or bad, no longer plays a role in the outcome. No longer will ten percent of the fisherman catch ninety percent of the fish as both neophyte and expert would equally be assured of unmitigated success. The infinite challenges that angling offers and the knowledge of a lifetime of experience would no longer be of any importance.

There is a famous story told of an angler who dies and goes on to the great river beyond which he is thrilled to discover is full of rising trout. Each and every one of his casts yields a three pound rainbow. They are all takers. The fish fight hard on both dry flies and nymphs and regardless of the presentation they are always willing and able to hook themselves. The first pleasant days turn into monotonous weeks and with each successive landing of an identical trout to the one preceding it, the angler soon realizes that the certainty of each cast in his utopia has all the ironies of a veritable trout purgatory.

One could quite easily argue along the line of reasoning that it is precisely because we do lose fish that we continue to make the journey back to the water, presumably to re-test our skills and attempt to catch that big one that always seem to get away. Ray Bergman, author of TROUT and other short stories that influenced the thoughts of an entire generation of fishermen, once wrote that it was the fish that get away that thrill and inspire us the most and that it is a neccesary good to lose fish once in awhile. Although Ray may be sounding like he (as all fisherman do at some point) may be trying to come to grips with the loss of a few good fish himself, there is certainly some greater truth to be gleaned beyond the simplicity of this statement.

All fisherman are haunted by the memory of a lost fish. It was none other than Theodore Gordon, the puritanical  father of American dry fly fishing, who in his memoirs, bemoaned that every day of his life he saw the head of the largest trout he ever hooked but did not land. For some, long after they may have forgotten what peculiar yet appealing idiosyncrasies allowed them to fall in love with their spouses, or what the name of their first hunting dog was, they will remember that one particular fish that got away. There will be many sleepless nights during which they will pore over the minutiae of events that led to the ultimate demise. WHAT WENT WRONG? For many, although impossible to quantify for obvious reasons, it will most certainly be amongst the last thoughs that flash through their minds before they die.

Sometimes nothing goes wrong yet our efforts are still met with failure. On those rare occasions where we are guilty of no wrongdoings, and through no fault of equipment nor obstacle, we still manage to lose fish. It is an immutable law of nature that big fish get away - that’s how they became big, as goes the old adage. Such are the vagaries of fishing.

It was widely reported, several years ago, that some charter boat angler fishing the famous King salmon run on the Kenai river in Alaska, had hooked a world record sized fish that he fought for nearly thirty-six hours. The news had spread quickly via radio to other charter boats and then to national media affiliates who soon had boats alongside filming the event live where a nation could watch the drama unfold from the comfort of their living rooms. The fish jumped twice for the cameras and all those involved were certain it was an all-tackle record. After a day and a half of give and take, both man and fish at the point of complete exhaustion, the fish surfaced one final time and rolled on its side. The captain of the boat lunged to net it but somehow missed, the hook slipped out of the corner of the fish’s mouth, and the giant fish sank back into the murky depths of the river in front of a national audience. Hero to zero in a nanosecond, depsite the fact it was still a superlative angling effort. No one knows for sure what became of that hapless angler but what we do know is that what may have been a legendary feat in the annals of sportfishing got relegated to a minor footnote in the dustbin of piscatorial ignominy. Now there is not much fairness there. 

Some fish afford such tremendous sport that the memory of an encounter can last a lifetime. The late Lee Wulff, a man whom we all owe a great deal, was said to have vividly remembered until the time of his death more than fifty years later, his first Atlantic salmon and how it changed the course of his entire life. This was the fish that prompted Wulff to embark on a pioneering journey of fishery conservation and it was he that coined the phrase that “a gamefish is too valuable to be caught only once“. His fish was a fresh-run twelve pound hen and it left a lasting impression on him until the day he died. Of course, this was a fish that he actually landed.

And while it is almost certain that a trophy fish well captured makes for a great memory, what about a great fish not captured? Well, that certainly makes for an entirely different memory. The former, the sweet memory of victory, the latter, the bitter residual taste of the vanquished. But as with most things in this world, memory is relative and all is in perception and how we view the proverbial half-glass of water. Success or failure are often the opposite sides of the same coin.

Many anglers, who would probably throttle Bergman if he uttered such heresy to them after they had just lost the fish of a lifetime, will with the many years thereafter distill the experience like fine wine or single malt scotch until the bitterness dissappears with the passage of time. No, it isn’t good to lose fish but it is a small price to pay if it keeps the sport honest and pure. Lost fish provide us with exhiliarating memories, sepia snapshots etched into our minds, that can both haunt and comfort us.

We should always endeavor to cultivate our memories as they encapsulate the long journey of our lives, highlighting the important events and destinations, like waypoints on a roadmap, giving definition and meaning to the things we cherish and hold close to our hearts. We are what we do and our sport and the way we individually approach it is an inner expression of ourselves. In the end, whether the fish was lost or landed is really of no importance at all.  Fishing is a combination of many things and for myself it has always been more about the fishing than the fish. Don’t get me wrong, the fish are a blast too!  But with some age and wisdom, I’m beginning to suspect that in the end, after all the fish of a lifetime have been culled and counted and measured and weighed, it is more about the journey than the destination and how we have acquiesced to the blessed uncertainty of the entire process. ARI VINEBERG  

Post from: Bounty Fishing Blog

BOREALIS CHAR

    It was my first trip to the Ungava peninsula and we were determined to accomplish what nobody with any fishing sense thought possible - catch an Artic char on a dry fly! As guests of a local hunting outfitter who had invited us to evaluate the fly-fishing potential of his territory, we flew in from Montreal on Air Inuit and landed in Kujuuak, formerly known as Fort Chimo. And while it was a mere two hour flight that separated our daily existences, it was like landing in another world altogether.

As the plane came in for its final descent, the arctic landscape came into view where the boreal forest sharply ended and the tundra began, a rich tapestry of greens and blues, thousands of rivers and lakes as far as the eye could see.  It was hard to tell if there was more land or water. As we circled the airstrip, the dirt roads and shacks of the settlement could be seen clearly from the air and there seemed to be no movement on the ground.  The mighty Koksoak river, influenced by the tidal waters of Ungava Bay, was at low tide and had left several fishing boats stranded on its sandy banks.  A few lay broken and bare on the shoreline, like giant whales that had beached themselves, dead corpses in an advanced state of decomposition, their broken backs and ribs exposed like skeletons in an open grave.  Like all of nature in this desolate place, the river imposes its rythm on the inhabitants and their way of life and forces them to adapt their activities to it’s incessant ebb and flow.

We were met at the airport by one of the men working for the outfitter who, upon our request, dropped us off in town to pick up some last minute supplies at the Hudson’s bay Store, instructing us to meet him at the smaller air field at the outskirts of town once we were done.  His sentence barely complete, half in English and French, the wheels of the Ford pick-up began spinning and we were left in a cloud of dust on the side of the road. The weather was unusually warm, with the mercury rising above a hundred fahrenheit and nothing stirred save for a mangy brown dog that crossed the dusty road and dissappeared behind a corrugated structure that looked like a warehouse.  The village was like a deserted ghost town. The general supply store was one of the oldest fur trading posts in the country, and as we walked through aisles overstocked with canned goods, ammunition, fishing tackle, and clothing, the wood flooring creaked beneath our footsteps and an age-old musty smell of trading history emanated from the floors and brought us back a hundred years to the era of fur-trading. We commented to each other, that strangely, we had not seen another person other than our driver since our arrival. The Inuit were not active in this weather confirmed the non-native cashier at the general store when asked about the whereabouts of the villagers. They were waiting for the weather to turn, she said, as she handed over my receipt and change.

We would be fishing for landlocked char in some inland lakes located northwest of Kujuuak, far above the treeline on the tundra, a vast and lonely landscape bejeweled with millions of lakes and rivers created by the receding glaciers at the end of the last Ice Age. Our base camp, one of eight satellite bases set up along some of the known caribou migration routes of the George River herd, was on Lake Rougemont, a large oligotrophic lake that was home to Artic char, lake, and brook trout.

It was late August and the char were preparing to spawn, staging at the mouth’s of rivers and creeks that flowed into the main lake. These were not sea-run fish and we had assumed that they would display characteristics similar to all trout everywhere and would inherently feel the age old genetic imperative to rise to an insect on the surface. If they weren’t like trout, we reasoned, then maybe they were somewhat like the often enigmatic Atlantic salmon. After all, if the king of finicky fish would, nevertheless, and with uncertain irregularity, smack the bejesus out of a floating fly, the same hopefulness could perhaps exist for the char.  After all, we were convinced enough to spend a few thousand dollars on the flight just to test the theory and possibly shed some light on the mystery. This had been the subject that animated many late night fishing discussions for two years until Johnny May, the most famous of all bush pilots in Arctic Quebec, gently alit the pontoons of the Beaver float plane upon the crystalline surface of the lake.

On our first day, under the advisement of Clifford, the camp manager and chief hunting guide, we headed out onto the main lake and began to fish near every trickle of water that discharged into the lake, no matter how small. As we discovered even the smallest flows - literally drops of water falling from three hundred foot rock precipices - would hold fish.  Near the first creek we located, we saw huge schools of ghostlike char that mysteriously appeared as shadows and then vanished into the turbulent water, leaving no clue as to their whereabouts. At first we though they were hallucinations. We were so excited that our hands trembled as we tied our flies to the ends of our tippets. This was the moment we had dreamed of for many years, travelling thousands of miles to the top of the world, above the fifty- eighth parrallel in the land of the midnight sun,  Eskimos, polar bears, igloos - and now we were about to realize our finest hour.

This was clearly our intention but nobody had told the char.

We drifted every fly in our boxes over their noses without a rise and then every so often, as if to get a rise out of us, a fish would surface near our flies, giving us the hopeful impression that they were rising to something, despite the absence of any visible hatch. As the day drew on without a fish, and the golden sun dropped over the flat horizon, we were both silent as we motored back to base camp. Maybe the naysayers were right and it was an impossible feat.

Unable to sleep that night, frustrated with the first day’s activities, I wandered out my tent to relieve myself in the middle of the night and was met with the most incredible sight of my life - the aurora borealis. The sky was lit up in a kaleidoscope of colors - reds, violets, purples, and pinks - that kept moving and shifting across the horizon, like a colorful curtain, hanging across the sky. For an hour or so, I watched this spectacular light show in complete awe and wondered about how the first Inuit to witness this interpreted this mysterious natural phenomena in their oral mythology.

The next two days were spent flagellating the water with similar results, our psyches becoming increasingly unhinged in the process as at night, under the influence of strong libation, we engaged in wild conjectures about char conspiraces within the Theodore Gordon Society, the mating habits of Arctic muskox, and whether or not Lee Wulff or Roderick Haigh-Brown was the greatest fly fisherman that ever lived.

At the end of each day, as we returned empty-handed, Clifford would would come running to meet us on the beach and upon hearing of our results would proclaim that he had the solution to our problems in his shirt pocket. His sharp blue eyes, hardened by years of living on the tundra, glittered with childlike amusement as he would then proceed to pull out several white curly tail jigs heads, waving them teasingly in front of our faces.

In order to maintain our faith in the feather and maintain what little sanity remained, in between our unsuccessful outings for char we took our frustrations out on the many brook trout in the creeks adjoining the various smaller lakes on the territory. At least these trout were willing to hit a dry fly. One particular fly, a black gnat, was very effective and had caught hundreds of fish before we ran out of the pattern. In complete contrast to the char, the trout fishing was so easy it was almost shameful.

On our last day, when failure was almost a certainty, we decided to hike across the tundra and fish another lake a few miles away. The Artic landscape spread before us like another planet and merely walking on the and greenish-grey colored lichen of the tundra was a strange experience, like walking on an uneven sponge and there is always the expectation of falling through its soft carpeting. It is an unforgiving land, and there are signs of it all around us.  A sun-bleached, ivory white rack of caribou antlers stands alone on the ground and points skyward in supplication. The remaining bones of the animal are scattered around on the ground, like runes, telling a story about a injured leg or a final struggle with a wolf or bear.  One can sense the loneliness of the land, the delicate balance between survival and death, the daily struggle to survive in this hostile environment.

Within minutes after arriving at the lake, my companion managed to get a small char on a streamer and as he fought it, confessed to me how he had stayed up late the night before and switched to a fast-sinking line, hoping I did not mind the breach of mission protocol. It was a beautiful fish, the first Arctic char that either of us had ever seen, other than from photos in fishing magazines. He caught several more fish like this while I continued to drift dries, again using every pattern in the fly box.

At one point, after switching over to a small brown Bomber pattern that had caught some smallmouth bass a few weeks earlier on my home waters and casting out in the current, I placed the rod on a rock and turned around to relieve myself on the tundra. No sooner than my pants were down below my knees there was a terrific splash and my companion began yelling at me. I turned slowly, thinking that he had another fish on but then saw my fly rod bouncing across the rocks towards the water. Leaping forward, I managed to grab the rod before is disappeared into the lake and when I reeled in the slack line I felt the weight of a good fish. The first run took me into my backing and I fought in for a good ten minutes before it finally lay exhausted at my feet.

There it finally was,  salvelinus alpinus, glistening in the sun like marvelous piece of museum artwork, sporting the colorations of the aurora borealis along its flanks, the object of a lengthy and noble quest, yet something didn’t feel quite right. Cold wind was blowing through my legs and I had an eerie sensation of being surrounded and watched by an unseen presence. I looked down and realized my pants were still around my ankles. As I stooped down to pull up my pants I suddenly wheeled around to face the tundra and was stunned by the sight that met my eyes. A thousand or so caribou had momentarily slowed down their migration, some at a standtill while others slowly trotted, apparently to stare at the odd human on the tundra, all the while snorting their indifference in the cold Arctic wind. - ARI VINEBERG

  

Post from: Bounty Fishing Blog